The core of EN 60825-4 testing is not a simple "pass/fail" determination, but rather the determination of the protective screen's protection time rating (T rating) under specific wavelength, power density, and irradiation time conditions, in accordance with the normative test methods in Annex D of the standard, and verification of whether it can control transmitted irradiance below the Protection Exposure Limit (PEL). The test report must state the test parameters and the basis for determination, rather than merely issuing a conclusive certificate.
I. Introduction: Why Testing Must Return to the Original Standard Text
Point out a common misconception in testing practice – treating protective screens as ordinary "light-blocking panels" and ignoring their quantitative essence of graded protection. EN 60825-4:2022 (equivalently adopted as GB/T 7247.4-2025) places the test requirements for dedicated laser protective screens in normative Annex D. This means the test method itself is mandatory standard content, not a technical protocol that can be freely agreed upon. The article should establish from the outset a judgement: test data not produced in accordance with the Annex D parameter system does not have the validity for a declaration of standard conformity.
II. Standard Basis and Applicable Boundaries of EN 60825-4 Laser Protective Screen Testing
Clarify "what is tested" and "what is not tested".
2.1 Version Lock-in of the Core Standard
The current effective version is IEC 60825-4:2022 (third edition), corresponding to the national standard GB/T 7247.4-2025, implemented on 1 September 2025, equivalently adopted without technical differences. Test reports citing older versions (such as the 2011 edition) need to be assessed as to whether their parameter systems are still accepted by the Annex D of the current edition.
2.2 Definition of Test Objects
The standard applies to permanent and temporary protective screens enclosing the processing area of laser processing machines, covering transparent viewing windows, baffles, protective curtains, and protective walls. It must be explicitly excluded: beam path components, beam stops, and other parts of guards that do not enclose the processing area – these fall under IEC 60825-1. If boundaries are confused during test plan design, the test load will mismatch the actual service conditions.
2.3 Scope Not Covered by the Standard
It only concerns laser radiation protection, not secondary radiation generated by material processing (such as ultraviolet, fumes, spatter). Test reports should not imply protective effectiveness against secondary hazards.
III. Core Logic of EN 60825-4 Laser Protective Screen Testing: From "Material Properties" to "System Protection Time"
Explain the essence that distinguishes EN 60825-4 testing from ordinary material testing.
3.1 How Protective Screen Ratings Are Defined
The standard classifies dedicated laser protective screens by protection time (e.g., T2, T3 ratings). Protection time refers to the duration under specified irradiation conditions during which the transmitted irradiance on the back of the protective screen does not exceed the PEL. The output of testing is not "how much power it can block" but "how long it can safely block under given laser parameters".
3.2 Indivisibility of the Test Parameter System
Annex D test requirements simultaneously record and control the following parameters: wavelength, laser power, operating mode (continuous/pulsed), effective beam diameter, and irradiation duration. The absence or deviation of any single parameter renders the T rating determination meaningless. For example, if the same material achieves a T3 rating at 1030 nm with a 20.8 mm beam diameter, but the actual working condition has a beam diameter reduced to 10 mm, the power density doubles, and the protection time will be significantly shortened.
3.3 PEL as the Determination Benchmark
Whether testing passes depends on whether the transmitted irradiance is below the Protection Exposure Limit (PEL). The PEL is given by the standard based on wavelength and irradiation time. Testing bodies must state in the report the PEL value used and its corresponding safety factor (typically including a 70% derating). A test report without a cited PEL value cannot verify the compliance of its determination logic.
IV. Key Control Points in Test Implementation
Identify operable aspects affecting test validity from an engineering practice perspective.
4.1 Sample Representativeness
Submitted samples must be consistent with mass production status, including material composition, thickness, coating, and frame structure. The protective performance of a protective screen may degrade due to seams, edge sealing, or the connection method between the transparent window and the frame. Test plans should require testing of finished components rather than only raw material samples.
4.2 Measurement Traceability of Beam Parameters
The measurement uncertainty of effective beam diameter and power density directly affects the conservatism of the T rating determination. Testing bodies should provide calibration traceability information for power meters and beam profilers. For continuous-wave fibre lasers (common wavelengths 1030–1090 nm), it must be confirmed that measurements are conducted under continuous-operation thermal steady state.
4.3 Setting of Irradiation Duration
The irradiation duration in standard testing (e.g., 15 s or 150 s) is used to simulate actual processing cycles or fault exposure scenarios. The testing client must provide the maximum continuous exposure time for the target application, and the testing body selects the test duration accordingly. If the actual processing cycle is 105 s, the passing result of a 150 s test is covering; if the actual cycle is 300 s, the test must be extended or the rating reduced.
4.4 Complete Elements of the Test Report
A traceable EN 60825-4 test report should contain at least: standard version number, sample description, laser parameters (wavelength/power/mode/beam diameter), irradiation time, PEL value and safety factor, measured transmitted irradiance, determined T rating, test date, and body identification. Missing any element leaves the report open to challenge in third-party audits or accident investigations.
V. Common Misconceptions and Determination Boundaries in EN 60825-4 Laser Protective Screen Testing
Correct two typical erroneous perceptions.
Misconception 1: Using laser protective eyewear standards in place of protective screen testing. The standard text explicitly states that a protective screen may also comply with laser protective eyewear standards, but such compliance does not necessarily satisfy the requirements of EN 60825-4. The test geometry of eyewear standards differs fundamentally from the large-area frontal irradiation conditions of protective screens and cannot be cross-referenced.
Misconception 2: Equating "not penetrated" with "test passed". The functional objective of a protective screen is not to avoid being physically burned through, but to maintain transmitted irradiance below the PEL within the protection time. A material may appear intact after testing, but its transmittance may have risen to an unacceptable level. Testing must be based on optical transmission measurement, not visual inspection.
VI. EN 60825-4 Laser Protective Screen Compliance Guide
The value of EN 60825-4 testing lies in converging the engineering judgement of "whether a protective screen is safe" into a measurable, reproducible parameter system. For laser processing equipment manufacturers and protective screen suppliers, testing that issues complete parameter reports in accordance with the current edition of Annex D is the reliable basis for compliance declarations. Against the background of the 2025 national standard having been implemented, reviewing the standard version and parameter completeness of existing test reports should be listed as a priority.
Shenzhen Zhongwei Inspection is a professional laser equipment testing and certification body in South China. In addition to laser product testing, our company also provides laser protective material testing, including laser protective screens and laser protective eyewear testing, with high testing efficiency and professional reliability.
If you have laser protective screens requiring EN 60825-4 testing for export to the EU, welcome to contact us for related services!
